4.22.2024
|
Docket No. EL24-104-000 PDF
On April 22, 2024, in Docket No. EL24-104-000, the PJM Load Parties, who include American Municipal Power, Inc., Delaware Division of the Public Advocate, Delaware Energy Users Group, Delaware Municipal Electric Corporation, Delaware Public Service Commission, Maryland Office of People’s Counsel, Maryland Public Service Commission, and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative, filed a conditional complaint against PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. The complaint requests that in the event the Commission grants PJM's Petition in Docket No. ER23-729-002 to recalculate Base Residual Auction (BRA) for the 2024/2025 Delivery Year, then the Commission: (1) grant this complaint with a refund effective date of April 22, 2024; (2) find that the recalculated 2024-25 BRA prices are unjust and unreasonable; (3) direct PJM to maintain the February 2023 BRA and the Third Incremental Auction results as the just and reasonable replacement rate; and, (4) take any other actions the Commission may deem necessary and appropriate. PJM’s answer to this conditional complaint is due by May 1, 2024.
|
4.22.2024
|
Docket No. ER24-1803-000 PDF
On April 22, 2024, in Docket No. ER24-1803-000, PJM proposed re-dated eTariff records of the PJM Tariff, Operating Agreement, and Reliability Assurance Agreement applicable to the capacity market components of PJM’s Order No. 2222 compliance filing in Docket No. ER22-962. Specifically, PJM proposed to re-date these eTariff records from their current effective dates July 1, 2023 and July 1, 2024, to a new effective date of July 1, 2025, in light of the fact that major components of PJM’s DER Aggregator Participation Model are still pending and unsettled at the Commission.
|
4.19.2024
|
Docket No. EL24-91-000 PDF
On April 19, 2024, in Docket No. EL24-91-000, PJM submitted an answer to the complaint of LS Power Development, LLC. In this Answer, PJM argues that FERC should find that PJM and the Market Monitor are in compliance with their respective obligations while agreeing that increased transparency into the opportunity cost adder would be beneficial.
|