AF2-356 System Impact Study Report
v0.06 released 2022-12-20 15:22
Albright-Mt. Zion 138 kV
105.0 MW Capacity / 175.0 MW Energy
Introduction
This System Impact Study Report (SIS) has been prepared in accordance with the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, 205, as well as the System Impact Study Agreement between CPV Backbone Solar, LLC, the Interconnection Customer (IC), and PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM), Transmission Provider (TP). The Interconnected Transmission Owner (ITO) is Appalachian Power.
Preface
The intent of the System Impact is to determine a plan, with approximate cost and construction time estimates, to connect the subject generation interconnection project to the PJM network at a location specified by the Interconnection Customer. As a requirement for interconnection, the Interconnection Customer may be responsible for the cost of constructing: Network Upgrades, which are facility additions, or upgrades to existing facilities, that are needed to maintain the reliability of the PJM system. All facilities required for interconnection of a generation interconnection project must be designed to meet the technical specifications (on PJM web site) for the appropriate transmission owner.
In some instances an Interconnection Customer may not be responsible for 100% of the identified network upgrade cost because other transmission network uses, e.g. another generation interconnection or merchant transmission upgrade, may also contribute to the need for the same network reinforcement. The possibility of sharing the reinforcement costs with other projects may be identified in the Feasibility Study, but the actual allocation will be deferred until the System Impact Study is performed.
The System Impact study estimates do not include the feasibility, cost, or time required to obtain property rights and permits for construction of the required facilities. The project developer is responsible for the right of way, real estate, and construction permit issues. For properties currently owned by Transmission Owners, the costs may be included in the study.
An Interconnection Customer with a proposed new Customer Facility that has a Maximum Facility Output equal to or greater than 100 MW shall install and maintain, at its expense, phasor measurement units (PMUs). See Section 8.5.3 of Appendix 2 to the Interconnection Service Agreement as well as section 4.3 of PJM Manual 14D for additional information.
General
The Interconnection Customer (IC), has proposed a generating facility located in Garrett County, Maryland. The installed facilities will have a total capability of 175.0 MW with 105.0 MW of this output being recognized by PJM as Capacity. The proposed in-service date for this project is Thursday, December 01, 2022. This study does not imply a TO commitment to this in-service date.
| Project Information | |
|---|---|
| Queue Number | AF2-356 |
| Project Name | Albright-Mt. Zion 138 kV |
| Developer Name | CPV Backbone Solar, LLC |
| State | Maryland |
| County | Garrett |
| Transmission Owner | APS |
| MFO | 175.0 MW |
| MWE | 175.0 MW |
| MWC | 105.0 MW |
| Fuel Type | Solar |
| Basecase Study Year | 2023 |
Point of Interconnection
The interconnection of the project at the Primary POI will be accomplished by constructing a new 138 kV three (3) breaker ring bus substation and looping the Albright – Mt. Zion 138 kV Line into the new substation. The new substation will be located approximately 23.6 miles from Albright Substation. The IC will be responsible for acquiring all easements, properties, and permits that may be required to construct both the new interconnection switching station and the associated facilities. The IC will also be responsible for the rough grade of the property and an access road to the proposed three breaker ring bus site. The project will also require Non-Direct Connection upgrades at Albright and Cross School substations.
Attachment 1 shows a one-line diagram of the proposed primary Direct Connection facilities for the AF2-356 generation project to connect to the FirstEnergy (“FE”) Transmission System. The IC will be responsible for constructing the facilities on its side of the POI, including the Attachment Facilities which connect the generator to the FE Transmission System’s Direct Connection facilities.
Cost Summary
The project may be responsible for a contribution to the following costs:
| Description | Total Cost |
|---|---|
| Attachment Facilities | $0 |
| Direct Connect Facilities | $0 |
| Non-Direct Connect Facilities | $0 |
| Physical Interconnection | $9,974,400 |
| System Reinforcements | $0 |
Note 1: PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) section 217.3A outline cost allocation rules. The rules are further clarified in PJM Manual 14A Attachment B. The allocation of costs for a network upgrade will start with the first Queue project to cause the need for the upgrade. Later queue projects will receive cost allocation contingent on their contribution to the violation and are allocated to the queues that have not closed less than 5 years following the execution of the first Interconnection Service Agreement which identifies the need for this upgrade.
Note 2: For customers with System Reinforcements listed: If your present cost allocation to a System Reinforcement indicates $0, then please be aware that as changes to the interconnection process occur, such as prior queued projects withdrawing from the queue, reducing in size, etc, the cost responsibilities can change and a cost allocation may be assigned to your project. In addition, although your present cost allocation to a System Reinforcement is presently $0, your project may need this system reinforcement completed to be deliverable to the PJM system. If your project comes into service prior to completion of the system reinforcement, an interim deliverability study for your project will be required.
Transmission Owner Scope of Work
The interconnection of the project at the Primary POI will be accomplished by constructing a new 138 kV three (3) breaker ring bus substation and looping the Albright – Mt. Zion 138 kV Line into the new substation. The new substation will be located approximately 23.6 miles from Albright Substation. The IC will be responsible for acquiring all easements, properties, and permits that may be required to construct both the new interconnection switching station and the associated facilities. The IC will also be responsible for the rough grade of the property and an access road to the proposed three breaker ring bus site. The project will also require Non-Direct Connection upgrades at Albright and Cross School substations.
The total preliminary cost estimate is given in the table below. These costs do not include CIAC Tax Gross-up.
| RTEP ID | Description | Cost Estimate |
|---|---|---|
| (TBD) | Construct new 138 kV three-breaker ring bus, looping in the Albright – Mt. Zion 138 kV Line. @ Swanton |
$6,081,500 |
| (TBD) | Loop in and out the Albright- Cross school AFA 138 kV line to new three-breaker ring bus at Swanton 138 kV Substation. Add one span and interconnect structure from substation to developer facilities. @ Albright-Cross School AFA 138 kV Line Loop |
$1,207,800 |
| (TBD) | Design, install, and test/commission MPLS and MW Equipment for SCADA transport. Path from Swanton to Dans Rock MW. @ Swanton |
$681,300 |
| (TBD) | Design, install, and test/commission MW radio to provide SCADA transport to Swanton. Path from Swanton to Dans Rock MW. @ Dans Rock MW |
$533,900 |
| (TBD) | Estimated (1) in-sub fiber run from Swanton Substation control house to developer-built fiber run to support communications and control to generator site. Estimated SCADA work at Albright and Cross School substations to support relay installations and wavetrap replacement. |
$87,600 |
| (TBD) | Project Management, Environmental, Forestry, Real Estate and Right of Way. |
$571,900 |
| (TBD) | Replace (1) wavetrap, (1) line tuner, and coax on Cross School line exit with wide-band devices. Replace (1) UPLC with (1) RFL-9780 for anti-islanding transmit to Swanton. @ Albright |
$318,900 |
| (TBD) | Modify drawings for line name change. @ Mt Zion |
$33,100 |
| (TBD) | Replace (1) wavetrap, (1) line tuner, and coax on Albright line exit with wide-band devices. Install (1) RFL-9780 for anti-islanding transmit to Swanton. Replace (1) UPLC with (1) RFL-9780 for anti-islanding receive from Swanton. @ Cross School |
$389,200 |
| (TBD) | Modify drawings for line name change. @ Beryl |
$33,300 |
| (TBD) | Review oneline, nameplate, and relay settings. @AF2-356 Gen Interconnection |
$31,300 |
| (TBD) | For AF2-356: Engineering oversight of specification and design of customer provided and owned revenue metering at interconnection customer substation. Remote engineering checkout of meter, support MV90 and Power Billing in setting up systems for getting and handling data from interconnection customer meter. |
$4,600 |
Based on the scope of work for the interconnection facilities, it is expected to take a range of 32 to 32 month(s) after the signing of an Interconnection Construction Service Agreement (as this is a FERC connection) and construction kickoff call to complete the installation of the physical connection work. This assumes that there will be no environmental issues with any of the new properties associated with this project, that there will be no delays in acquiring the necessary permits for implementing the defined interconnection work, and that all system outages will be allowed when requested.
The schedule for any required Network Impact Reinforcements will be more clearly identified in future study phases. The estimated time to complete each of the required reinforcements is identified in the "System Reinforcements" section of the report.
Transmission Owner Analysis
FE performed an analysis of its underlying transmission <100 kV system. The AF2-356 project did not contribute to any overloads on the FE transmission <100 kV system.
Interconnection Customer Requirements
System Protection
The IC must design it’s Customer Facilities in accordance with all applicable standards, including the standards in FE’s “Requirements for Transmission Connected Facilities” document located at: http://www.pjm.com/planning/design-engineering/to-tech-standards/private-firstenergy.aspx. Preliminary Protection requirements will be provided as part of the Facilities Study. Detailed Protection Requirements will be provided once the project enters the construction phase.
Compliance Issues and Interconnection Customer Requirements
The proposed Customer Facilities must be designed in accordance with FE’s “Requirements for Transmission Connected Facilities” document located at: http://www.pjm.com/planning/design-engineering/to-tech-standards/private-firstenergy.aspx. In particular, the IC is responsible for the following:
- The purchase and installation of a fully rated 138 kV circuit breaker to protect the AF2-356 generator lead line. A single circuit breaker must be used to protect this line; if the project has several GSU transformers, the individual GSU transformer breakers cannot be used to protect this line.
- The purchase and installation of the minimum required FE generation interconnection relaying and control facilities. This includes over/under voltage protection, over/under frequency protection, and zero sequence voltage protection relays.
- The purchase and installation of supervisory control and data acquisition (“SCADA”) equipment to provide information in a compatible format to the FE Transmission System Control Center.
- Compliance with the FE and PJM generator power factor and voltage control requirements.
- The execution of a back-up service agreement to serve the customer load supplied from the AF2-356 generation project metering point when the units are out-of-service. This assumes the intent of the IC is to net the generation with the load.
The IC will also be required to meet all PJM, ReliabilityFirst, and NERC reliability criteria and operating procedures for standards compliance. For example, the IC will need to properly locate and report the over and under voltage and over and under frequency system protection elements for its units as well as the submission of the generator model and protection data required to satisfy the PJM and ReliabilityFirst audits. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in a disconnection of service if the violation is found to compromise the reliability of the FE system.
Power Factor Requirements
The IC shall design its non-synchronous Customer Facility with the ability to maintain a power factor of at least 0.95 leading (absorbing VARs) to 0.95 lagging (supplying VARs) measured at the high-side of the facility substation transformer(s) connected to the FE transmission system.
Revenue Metering and SCADA Requirements
The Interconnection Customer will be required to install equipment necessary to provide Revenue Metering (KWH, KVARH) and real time data (KW, KVAR) for IC's generating Resource. See PJM Manuals M-01 and M14D, and PJM Tariff Section 8 of Attachment O.Meteorological Data Reporting Requirement
The solar generation facility shall provide the Transmission Provider with site-specific meteorological data including:Interconnection Transmission Owner Requirements
- Temperature (degrees Fahrenheit)
- Atmospheric Pressure (hectopascals)
- Irradiance
- Forced outage data
The IC will be required to comply with all Interconnected Transmission Owner's revenue metering requirements for generation interconnection customers located at the following link: PJM - Transmission Owner Engineering & Construction Standards.
PJM Transmission Network Impacts Analysis
Summer Peak Analysis
The Queue Project was evaluated as a 175.0 MW (Capacity 105.0 MW) injection in the area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential Summer peak period network impacts were as follows:
| Area | Facility Description | Contingency Name | Contingency Type | DC|AC | Initial Loading | Final Loading | Rating (MVA) | Rating Type | MVA to Mitigate | MW Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP |
01RIDGLY-01MESSCK 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
235504 to 235484 ckt 1 |
AP-P2-3-PE-500-018D
CONTINGENCY 'AP-P2-3-PE-500-018D' DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235103 CKT 1 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BLACKO 500.0 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235445 CKT 2 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BEDNGT 138.0 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235445 CKT 4 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BEDNGT 138.0 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 237000 CKT ZB /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BEDNGT CAP 500.0 END |
Breaker | AC | 103.13 % | 106.98 % | 229.0 | B | 244.98 | 9.7 |
| AP |
01RIDGLY-01MESSCK 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
235504 to 235484 ckt 1 |
AP-P2-3-PE-500-018C
CONTINGENCY 'AP-P2-3-PE-500-018C' DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235103 CKT 1 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BLACKO 500.0 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235445 CKT 1 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BEDNGT 138.0 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235101 TO BUS 235445 CKT 3 /*01BEDNGT 500.0 - 01BEDNGT 138.0 END |
Breaker | AC | 103.08 % | 106.93 % | 229.0 | B | 244.87 | 9.7 |
Details for 01RIDGLY-01MESSCK 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line l/o AP-P2-3-PE-500-018D
| Bus # | Bus Name | Type | Full MW Contribution | GenDeliv MW Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 235004 | AA1-092 C | Adder | -0.5 MW | -0.43 MW |
| 235098 | U2-073A E | 50/50 | 17.46 MW | 17.46 MW |
| 235526 | 01WR_AA1-100 | 50/50 | 1.83 MW | 1.83 MW |
| 235530 | 01TR_U2-073A | 50/50 | 0.41 MW | 0.41 MW |
| 236001 | 01WARRIOR RN | 50/50 | 5.29 MW | 5.29 MW |
| 237312 | 01DANS_S-014 | 50/50 | 2.06 MW | 2.06 MW |
| 237319 | 01FMR_U2-030 | 50/50 | 0.18 MW | 0.18 MW |
| 237508 | CROSSCHOOL E | Adder | 2.34 MW | 1.99 MW |
| 290229 | S-014 E | 50/50 | 8.25 MW | 8.25 MW |
| 923971 | AB2-038 | 50/50 | 0.61 MW | 0.61 MW |
| 929522 | U2-030 E | 50/50 | 6.82 MW | 6.82 MW |
| 934361 | AD1-060 C | Adder | -0.42 MW | -0.36 MW |
| 934362 | AD1-060 E | Adder | -0.69 MW | -0.59 MW |
| 940461 | AE2-030 C | 50/50 | 1.17 MW | 1.17 MW |
| 940462 | AE2-030 E | 50/50 | 1.6 MW | 1.6 MW |
| 940671 | AE2-054 C | Adder | -1.08 MW | -0.92 MW |
| 942731 | AE2-289 C | 50/50 | 1.7 MW | 1.7 MW |
| 942732 | AE2-289 E | 50/50 | 9.85 MW | 9.85 MW |
| 942901 | AE2-309 C | 50/50 | 2.23 MW | 2.23 MW |
| 942902 | AE2-309 E | 50/50 | 0.43 MW | 0.43 MW |
| 943301 | AF1-001 C | Adder | 0.47 MW | 0.4 MW |
| 943302 | AF1-001 E | Adder | 0.52 MW | 0.45 MW |
| 960651 | AF2-356 C | Adder | 5.82 MW | 4.95 MW |
| 960652 | AF2-356 E | Adder | 3.88 MW | 3.3 MW |
| 938753 | AE1-101 BAT | Adder | 5.36 MW | 4.56 MW |
| 959843 | AF2-275 BAT | Adder | 0.11 MW | 0.1 MW |
| 959853 | AF2-276 BAT | Adder | 0.11 MW | 0.1 MW |
| LGEE | LTFEXP_LGEE->LTFIMP_LGEE | CLTF | 0.26 MW | 0.26 MW |
| CPLE | LTFEXP_CPLE->LTFIMP_CPLE | CLTF | 0.01 MW | 0.01 MW |
| CBM-W2 | LTFEXP_CBM-W2->LTFIMP_CBM-W2 | CLTF | 3.16 MW | 3.16 MW |
| NY | LTFEXP_NY->LTFIMP_NY | CLTF | 0.23 MW | 0.23 MW |
| TVA | LTFEXP_TVA->LTFIMP_TVA | CLTF | 0.47 MW | 0.47 MW |
| WEC | LTFEXP_WEC->LTFIMP_WEC | CLTF | 0.15 MW | 0.15 MW |
| O-066 | LTFEXP_O-066->LTFIMP_O-066 | CLTF | 4.36 MW | 4.36 MW |
| CBM-S2 | LTFEXP_CBM-S2->LTFIMP_CBM-S2 | CLTF | 0.66 MW | 0.66 MW |
| CBM-S1 | LTFEXP_CBM-S1->LTFIMP_CBM-S1 | CLTF | 3.02 MW | 3.02 MW |
| G-007 | LTFEXP_G-007->LTFIMP_G-007 | CLTF | 0.69 MW | 0.69 MW |
| MEC | LTFEXP_MEC->LTFIMP_MEC | CLTF | 0.69 MW | 0.69 MW |
| CBM-W1 | LTFEXP_CBM-W1->LTFIMP_CBM-W1 | CLTF | 5.88 MW | 5.88 MW |
Details for 01RIDGLY-01MESSCK 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line l/o AP-P2-3-PE-500-018C
| Bus # | Bus Name | Type | Full MW Contribution | GenDeliv MW Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 235004 | AA1-092 C | Adder | -0.5 MW | -0.43 MW |
| 235098 | U2-073A E | 50/50 | 17.46 MW | 17.46 MW |
| 235526 | 01WR_AA1-100 | 50/50 | 1.83 MW | 1.83 MW |
| 235530 | 01TR_U2-073A | 50/50 | 0.41 MW | 0.41 MW |
| 236001 | 01WARRIOR RN | 50/50 | 5.29 MW | 5.29 MW |
| 237312 | 01DANS_S-014 | 50/50 | 2.06 MW | 2.06 MW |
| 237319 | 01FMR_U2-030 | 50/50 | 0.18 MW | 0.18 MW |
| 237508 | CROSSCHOOL E | Adder | 2.34 MW | 1.99 MW |
| 290229 | S-014 E | 50/50 | 8.25 MW | 8.25 MW |
| 923971 | AB2-038 | 50/50 | 0.61 MW | 0.61 MW |
| 929522 | U2-030 E | 50/50 | 6.82 MW | 6.82 MW |
| 934361 | AD1-060 C | Adder | -0.42 MW | -0.36 MW |
| 934362 | AD1-060 E | Adder | -0.69 MW | -0.58 MW |
| 940461 | AE2-030 C | 50/50 | 1.17 MW | 1.17 MW |
| 940462 | AE2-030 E | 50/50 | 1.6 MW | 1.6 MW |
| 940671 | AE2-054 C | Adder | -1.08 MW | -0.92 MW |
| 942731 | AE2-289 C | 50/50 | 1.7 MW | 1.7 MW |
| 942732 | AE2-289 E | 50/50 | 9.85 MW | 9.85 MW |
| 942901 | AE2-309 C | 50/50 | 2.23 MW | 2.23 MW |
| 942902 | AE2-309 E | 50/50 | 0.43 MW | 0.43 MW |
| 943301 | AF1-001 C | Adder | 0.47 MW | 0.4 MW |
| 943302 | AF1-001 E | Adder | 0.52 MW | 0.45 MW |
| 960651 | AF2-356 C | Adder | 5.82 MW | 4.95 MW |
| 960652 | AF2-356 E | Adder | 3.88 MW | 3.3 MW |
| 938753 | AE1-101 BAT | Adder | 5.35 MW | 4.55 MW |
| 959843 | AF2-275 BAT | Adder | 0.11 MW | 0.1 MW |
| 959853 | AF2-276 BAT | Adder | 0.11 MW | 0.1 MW |
| LGEE | LTFEXP_LGEE->LTFIMP_LGEE | CLTF | 0.26 MW | 0.26 MW |
| CPLE | LTFEXP_CPLE->LTFIMP_CPLE | CLTF | 0.01 MW | 0.01 MW |
| CBM-W2 | LTFEXP_CBM-W2->LTFIMP_CBM-W2 | CLTF | 3.16 MW | 3.16 MW |
| NY | LTFEXP_NY->LTFIMP_NY | CLTF | 0.23 MW | 0.23 MW |
| TVA | LTFEXP_TVA->LTFIMP_TVA | CLTF | 0.47 MW | 0.47 MW |
| WEC | LTFEXP_WEC->LTFIMP_WEC | CLTF | 0.15 MW | 0.15 MW |
| O-066 | LTFEXP_O-066->LTFIMP_O-066 | CLTF | 4.36 MW | 4.36 MW |
| CBM-S2 | LTFEXP_CBM-S2->LTFIMP_CBM-S2 | CLTF | 0.66 MW | 0.66 MW |
| CBM-S1 | LTFEXP_CBM-S1->LTFIMP_CBM-S1 | CLTF | 3.02 MW | 3.02 MW |
| G-007 | LTFEXP_G-007->LTFIMP_G-007 | CLTF | 0.69 MW | 0.69 MW |
| MEC | LTFEXP_MEC->LTFIMP_MEC | CLTF | 0.69 MW | 0.69 MW |
| CBM-W1 | LTFEXP_CBM-W1->LTFIMP_CBM-W1 | CLTF | 5.88 MW | 5.88 MW |
Summer Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability
PJM also studied the delivery of the energy portion of this interconnection request. Any problems identified below are likely to result in operational restrictions to the project under study. The developer can proceed with network upgrades to eliminate the operational restriction at their discretion by submitting a Merchant Transmission Interconnection request.
Note: Only the most severely overloaded conditions are listed below. There is no guarantee of full delivery of energy for this project by fixing only the conditions listed in this section. With a Transmission Interconnection Request, a subsequent analysis will be performed which shall study all overload conditions associated with the overloaded element(s) identified.
| Area | Facility Description | Contingency Name | Contingency Type | DC|AC | Initial Loading | Final Loading | Rating (MVA) | Rating Type | MVA to Mitigate | MW Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AP |
01MTZION-01WESTVA 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
235492 to 235518 ckt 1 |
AP-P1-2-WP-500-006
CONTINGENCY 'AP-P1-2-WP-500-006' DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 235108 TO BUS 235103 CKT 1 /*01HATFLD 500.0 - 01BLACKO 500.0 END |
OP | AC | 55.57 % | 100.81 % | 206.0 | B | 207.67 | 93.38 |
Details for 01MTZION-01WESTVA 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line l/o AP-P1-2-WP-500-006
| Bus # | Bus Name | Type | Full MW Contribution | GenDeliv MW Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 235091 | U2-061_E | Adder | 2.19 MW | 1.86 MW |
| 958181 | AF2-112 C O1 | Adder | 0.69 MW | 0.58 MW |
| 958182 | AF2-112 E O1 | Adder | 0.34 MW | 0.29 MW |
| 960651 | AF2-356 C | 50/50 | 56.03 MW | 56.03 MW |
| 960652 | AF2-356 E | 50/50 | 37.35 MW | 37.35 MW |
| LGEE | LTFEXP_LGEE->LTFIMP_LGEE | CLTF | 0.22 MW | 0.22 MW |
| CBM-W2 | LTFEXP_CBM-W2->LTFIMP_CBM-W2 | CLTF | 2.56 MW | 2.56 MW |
| NY | LTFEXP_NY->LTFIMP_NY | CLTF | 0.13 MW | 0.13 MW |
| TVA | LTFEXP_TVA->LTFIMP_TVA | CLTF | 0.35 MW | 0.35 MW |
| WEC | LTFEXP_WEC->LTFIMP_WEC | CLTF | 0.13 MW | 0.13 MW |
| O-066 | LTFEXP_O-066->LTFIMP_O-066 | CLTF | 2.84 MW | 2.84 MW |
| CBM-S2 | LTFEXP_CBM-S2->LTFIMP_CBM-S2 | CLTF | 0.04 MW | 0.04 MW |
| CBM-S1 | LTFEXP_CBM-S1->LTFIMP_CBM-S1 | CLTF | 2.36 MW | 2.36 MW |
| G-007 | LTFEXP_G-007->LTFIMP_G-007 | CLTF | 0.45 MW | 0.45 MW |
| MEC | LTFEXP_MEC->LTFIMP_MEC | CLTF | 0.58 MW | 0.58 MW |
| CBM-W1 | LTFEXP_CBM-W1->LTFIMP_CBM-W1 | CLTF | 5.14 MW | 5.14 MW |
Winter Peak Analysis
At this time winter peak analysis not required for this project.
Winter Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability
At this time winter peak analysis not required for this project.
Light Load Analysis
At this time light load analysis not required for this project.
Light Load Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability
At this time light load analysis not required for this project.
Short Circuit Analysis
PJM Short Circuit Analysis did not identify any new overduty breakers or >3% contribution to previously identified overduty breakers.
Stability Analysis
Stability Analysis completed, no mitigation needed.
Reactive Power Analysis
Based on the Impact Study data provided, the AF2-356 model met both the 0.95 lagging and the 0.95 leading power factor requirement at the high side of the main transformer.
Steady-State Voltage Analysis
Steady State Voltage analysis is not required for this queue project at this time.
Queue Dependencies
The Queue Projects below are listed in one or more dispatch for the overloads identified in your report. These projects contribute to the loading of the overloaded facilities identified in your report. The percent overload of a facility and cost allocation you may have towards a particular reinforcement could vary depending on the action of these earlier projects. The status of each project at the time of the analysis is presented in the table. This list may change as earlier projects withdraw or modify their requests. This table is valid for load flow analyses only.
| Queue Number | Project Name | Status |
|---|---|---|
| AA1-092 | Halfway 34.5kV | Engineering & Procurement |
| AB2-038 | Frostburg 138kV | In Service |
| AD1-060 | Mercersburg-Milnor 34.5 kV | In Service |
| AE1-101 | McConnellsburg-Texas Eastern 138 kV | Engineering & Procurement |
| AE2-030 | Frostburg 138kV | Active |
| AE2-054 | Warfordsburg 34 kV | Engineering & Procurement |
| AE2-289 | Frostburg 138 kV | Active |
| AE2-309 | Carlos Junction-Lonaconing 34.5 kV | Engineering & Procurement |
| AF1-001 | Thayerville 34.5 kV | Suspended |
| AF2-275 | Guilford 12.47 kV | Suspended |
| AF2-276 | Guilford 12.47 kV | Suspended |
| U2-030 | Four Mile Ridge Wind 138kV | In Service |
* = Queue Project is after AF2-356 in queue order. Withdrawal of this project is unlikely to affect cost allocation for AF2-356.
Affected Systems
System Reinforcements
| RTEP ID | Title | Total Cost | Time Estimate |
|---|---|---|---|
| b3158 | Replace line relays on the Ridgeley line terminal at Messick Rd. 138 kV substation. (ISD 3/11/2021) | $220,000 | Mar 11 2021 |
Note: Although Queue Project AF2-356 may not have cost responsibility for this upgrade, Queue Project AF2-356 may need this upgrade in-service to be deliverable to the PJM system. If Queue Project AF2-356 comes into service prior to completion of the upgrade, Queue Project AF2-356 will need an interim study.
| Facility | Contingency |
|---|---|
| 01MESSCK-01RIDGLY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line | (Any) |
| Facility | Rating Set | Rating Type | Rating Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01MESSCK-01RIDGLY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line | (All) | A | 221.0 MVA |
| 01MESSCK-01RIDGLY 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line | (All) | B | 268.0 MVA |