AE2-022 System Impact Study Report

v0.14 released 2022-12-22 17:02

Cardiff 230 kV III

52.8 MW Capacity / 300.0 MW Energy

Introduction

This System Impact Study Report (SIS) has been prepared in accordance with the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff, 205, as well as the System Impact Study Agreement between Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Project 1, LLC, the Interconnection Customer (IC), and PJM Interconnection, LLC (PJM), Transmission Provider (TP). The Interconnected Transmission Owner (ITO) is Atlantic City Electric.

Revision 1: March 2022 - The AE2-022 System Impact Study Report has been revised to reflect the results of PJM's retool study.

Revision 2: April 2022 - The report was further updated to correct an error in the Cost Summary.

Revision 3: November 2022 - The report was revised to reflect the results of an additional retool study. Final scope and cost estimates will be provided as part of the Facilities Study.

Revision 4: December 2022 - The report was revised to reflect the results PJM's retool study.

Preface

The intent of the System Impact is to determine a plan, with approximate cost and construction time estimates, to connect the subject generation interconnection project to the PJM network at a location specified by the Interconnection Customer. As a requirement for interconnection, the Interconnection Customer may be responsible for the cost of constructing: Network Upgrades, which are facility additions, or upgrades to existing facilities, that are needed to maintain the reliability of the PJM system. All facilities required for interconnection of a generation interconnection project must be designed to meet the technical specifications (on PJM web site) for the appropriate transmission owner.

In some instances an Interconnection Customer may not be responsible for 100% of the identified network upgrade cost because other transmission network uses, e.g. another generation interconnection or merchant transmission upgrade, may also contribute to the need for the same network reinforcement. The possibility of sharing the reinforcement costs with other projects may be identified in the Feasibility Study, but the actual allocation will be deferred until the System Impact Study is performed.

The System Impact study estimates do not include the feasibility, cost, or time required to obtain property rights and permits for construction of the required facilities. The project developer is responsible for the right of way, real estate, and construction permit issues. For properties currently owned by Transmission Owners, the costs may be included in the study.

An Interconnection Customer with a proposed new Customer Facility that has a Maximum Facility Output equal to or greater than 100 MW shall install and maintain, at its expense, phasor measurement units (PMUs). See Section 8.5.3 of Appendix 2 to the Interconnection Service Agreement as well as section 4.3 of PJM Manual 14D for additional information.

General

The Interconnection Customer (IC), has proposed a generating facility located in Atlantic County, New Jersey. The installed facilities will have a total capability of 300.0 MW with 52.8 MW of this output being recognized by PJM as Capacity. The proposed in-service date for this project is Sunday, December 01, 2024. This study does not imply a TO commitment to this in-service date.

Project Information
Queue Number AE2-022
Project Name Cardiff 230 kV III
Developer Name Atlantic Shores Offshore Wind Project 1, LLC
State New Jersey
County Atlantic
Transmission Owner AEC
MFO 300.0 MW
MWE 300.0 MW
MWC 52.8 MW
Fuel Type Offshore Wind
Basecase Study Year 2022
Point of Interconnection

AE2-022 will interconnect with on the AEC transmission system at the Cardiff 230 kV substation.

Cost Summary

The project may be responsible for a contribution to the following costs:

Description Total Cost
Attachment Facilities $0
Direct Connect Facilities $0
Non-Direct Connect Facilities $0
Physical Interconnection $0
System Reinforcements $105,585,000

Note 1: PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) section 217.3A outline cost allocation rules. The rules are further clarified in PJM Manual 14A Attachment B. The allocation of costs for a network upgrade will start with the first Queue project to cause the need for the upgrade. Later queue projects will receive cost allocation contingent on their contribution to the violation and are allocated to the queues that have not closed less than 5 years following the execution of the first Interconnection Service Agreement which identifies the need for this upgrade.

Note 2: For customers with System Reinforcements listed: If your present cost allocation to a System Reinforcement indicates $0, then please be aware that as changes to the interconnection process occur, such as prior queued projects withdrawing from the queue, reducing in size, etc, the cost responsibilities can change and a cost allocation may be assigned to your project. In addition, although your present cost allocation to a System Reinforcement is presently $0, your project may need this system reinforcement completed to be deliverable to the PJM system. If your project comes into service prior to completion of the system reinforcement, an interim deliverability study for your project will be required.

Transmission Owner Scope of Work

See AE2-020 report for physical interconnection scope of work.

 

The schedule for any required Network Impact Reinforcements will be more clearly identified in future study phases. The estimated time to complete each of the required reinforcements is identified in the "System Reinforcements" section of the report.

Transmission Owner Analysis

None

Interconnection Customer Requirements

The IC is responsible for all design and construction related to activities on their side of the Point of Interconnection. Site preparation, including grading and an access road, as necessary, is assumed to be by the IC. Route selection, line design, and right-of-way acquisition of the direct connect facilities is not included in this report, and is the responsibility of the IC. Protective relaying and metering design and installation must comply with ACE’s applicable standards. The IC is also required to provide revenue metering and real-time telemetering data to PJM in conformance with the requirements contained in PJM Manuals M-01 and M-14 and the PJM Tariff.

 

ACE requires that an IC circuit breaker is located within 500 feet of the ACE substation to facilitate the relay protection scheme between ACE and the IC at the Point of Interconnection (POI).

 

Additional Interconnection Customer Responsibilities:

  1. An Interconnection Customer entering the New Services Queue on or after October 1, 2012 with a proposed new Customer Facility that has a Maximum Facility Output equal to or greater than 100 MW shall install and maintain, at its expense, phasor measurement units (PMUs). See Section 8.5.3 of Appendix 2 to the Interconnection Service Agreement as well as section 4.3 of PJM Manual 14D for additional information.
  2. The Interconnection Customer may be required to install and/or pay for metering as necessary to properly track real time output of the facility as well as installing metering which shall be used for billing purposes. See Section 8 of Appendix 2 to the Interconnection Service Agreement as well as Section 4 of PJM Manual 14D for additional information.
  3. The Interconnection Customer seeking to interconnect a wind generation facility shall maintain meteorological data facilities as well as provide that meteorological data which is required per item 5.IV of Schedule H to the Interconnection Service Agreement.

 

Special Operating Requirements

 

  1. ACE will require the capability to remotely disconnect the generator from the grid by communication from its System Operations facility. Such disconnection may be facilitated by a generator breaker, or other method depending upon the specific circumstances and the evaluation by ACE.
  2. ACE reserves the right to charge the Interconnection Customer operation and maintenance expenses to maintain the Interconnection Customer attachment facilities, including metering and telecommunications facilities, owned by ACE.

 

Revenue Metering and SCADA Requirements
PJM Requirements
The Interconnection Customer will be required to install equipment necessary to provide Revenue Metering (KWH, KVARH) and real time data (KW, KVAR) for IC's generating Resource. See PJM Manuals M-01 and M14D, and PJM Tariff Section 8 of Attachment O.
Meteorological Data Reporting Requirement
The wind generation facility shall provide the Transmission Provider with site-specific meteorological data including::
  • Wind speed (meters/second) - (Required)
  • Wind direction (decimal degrees from true north) - (Required)
  • Ambient air temperature (Fahrenheit) - (Required)
  • Air Pressure (Hectopascals) - (Required)
  • Humidity (Percent) (Accepted, not required)
Interconnection Transmission Owner Requirements
The IC will be required to comply with all Interconnected Transmission Owner's revenue metering requirements for generation interconnection customers located at the following link: PJM - Transmission Owner Engineering & Construction Standards.

PJM Transmission Network Impacts Analysis

Summer Peak Analysis

The Queue Project was evaluated as a 300.0 MW (Capacity 52.8 MW) injection in the area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential Summer peak period network impacts were as follows:

Area Facility Description Contingency Name Contingency Type DC|AC Initial Loading Final Loading Rating (MVA) Rating Type MVA to Mitigate MW Contribution Details
AE/JCPL CEDAR-28OYSTER C 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227955 to 206302 ckt 1
AE_P4-2 AE7
CONTINGENCY 'AE_P4-2 AE7'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 219100 TO BUS 227900 CKT 1   /*NEWFRDM      230.0 - CARDIFF      230.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 227900 TO BUS 227910 CKT 1   /*CARDIFF      230.0 - CARDIFF1      69.0
END
Breaker AC 89.98 % 107.72 % 564.0 B 607.54 100.02 Details
AE/JCPL CEDAR-28OYSTER C 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227955 to 206302 ckt 1
AE_P4-2 AE6
CONTINGENCY 'AE_P4-2 AE6'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 219100 TO BUS 227900 CKT 1   /*NEWFRDM      230.0 - CARDIFF      230.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 227900 TO BUS 227911 CKT 1   /*CARDIFF      230.0 - CARDIFF2      69.0
END
Breaker AC 89.98 % 107.71 % 564.0 B 607.48 100.01 Details
AE/PSEG CARDIFF-NEWFRDM 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227900 to 219100 ckt 1
JC-P7-1-JCC-230-13
CONTINGENCY 'JC-P7-1-JCC-230-13'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 206297 TO BUS 206302 CKT 1   /*28MANITOU    230.0 - 28OYSTER C   230.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 206297 TO BUS 206302 CKT 2   /*28MANITOU    230.0 - 28OYSTER C   230.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 206302 TO BUS 206325 CKT 1   /*28OYSTER C   230.0 - 28O C GEN     24.0
END
Tower AC 100.74 % 118.86 % 692.0 B 822.51 127.41 Details
AE LEWIS #2-LEWIS #1 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227945 to 227902 ckt 1
AE_P7-1 AE3TOWER
CONTINGENCY 'AE_P7-1 AE3TOWER'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 227900 TO BUS 227955 CKT 1   /*CARDIFF      230.0 - CEDAR        230.0
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 227913 TO BUS 227902 CKT 1   /*CARDIFF      138.0 - LEWIS #1     138.0
END
Tower DC 92.79 % 105.13 % 286.8 B 301.51 35.37 Details
Summer Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability

PJM also studied the delivery of the energy portion of this interconnection request. Any problems identified below are likely to result in operational restrictions to the project under study. The developer can proceed with network upgrades to eliminate the operational restriction at their discretion by submitting a Merchant Transmission Interconnection request.

Note: Only the most severely overloaded conditions are listed below. There is no guarantee of full delivery of energy for this project by fixing only the conditions listed in this section. With a Transmission Interconnection Request, a subsequent analysis will be performed which shall study all overload conditions associated with the overloaded element(s) identified.

Area Facility Description Contingency Name Contingency Type DC|AC Initial Loading Final Loading Rating (MVA) Rating Type MVA to Mitigate MW Contribution Details
AE/JCPL CEDAR-28OYSTER C 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227955 to 206302 ckt 1
PS_P1-2_2310A
CONTINGENCY 'PS_P1-2_2310A'
 TRIP LINE FROM BUS 219100 TO BUS 227900 CKT 1   /*NEWFRDM      230.0 - CARDIFF      230.0
END
OP AC 89.42 % 107.06 % 564.0 B 603.82 99.52 Details
AE/JCPL CEDAR-28OYSTER C 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
227955 to 206302 ckt 1
Base Case

            
OP AC 92.34 % 107.06 % 464.0 A 496.76 68.26 Details
JCPL 28OYSTER C-28MANITOU 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
206302 to 206297 ckt 1
JC-P1-2-JCC-230-022
CONTINGENCY 'JC-P1-2-JCC-230-022'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 206297 TO BUS 206302 CKT 2   /*28MANITOU    230.0 - 28OYSTER C   230.0
END
OP AC 111.04 % 118.34 % 817.0 B 966.84 62.44 Details
JCPL 28OYSTER C-28MANITOU 230.0 kV Ckt 2 line
206302 to 206297 ckt 2
JC-P1-2-JCC-230-021
CONTINGENCY 'JC-P1-2-JCC-230-021'
 DISCONNECT BRANCH FROM BUS 206297 TO BUS 206302 CKT 1   /*28MANITOU    230.0 - 28OYSTER C   230.0
END
OP AC 104.41 % 111.28 % 869.0 B 967.02 62.45 Details
PSEG GLOUCSTR-CUTHBERT_4 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line
219110 to 219755 ckt 1
PS_P1-2_C-2308_LT
CONTINGENCY 'PS_P1-2_C-2308_LT'
 CLOSE LINE FROM BUS 219177 TO BUS 219178 CKT Z   /*CUTHBERT_L4   13.2 - CUTHBERT_L2   13.2
 DISCONNECT BUS 219753                            /*CUTHBERT_2   230.0
 MOVE 8 MW LOAD FROM BUS 219177 TO BUS 219677     /*CUTHBERT_L4   13.2 - MAPLE SHADE   13.2
 MOVE 8 MW LOAD FROM BUS 219178 TO BUS 219678     /*CUTHBERT_L2   13.2 - MAPLE SHADE   13.2
END
OP AC 98.26 % 101.36 % 758.0 B 768.31 27.12 Details
Winter Peak Analysis

At this time winter peak analysis not required for this project.

Winter Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability

At this time winter peak analysis not required for this project.

Light Load Analysis

The Queue Project was evaluated as a 300.0 MW (Capacity 52.8 MW) injection in the area. Project was evaluated for compliance with applicable reliability planning criteria (PJM, NERC, NERC Regional Reliability Councils, and Transmission Owners). Potential light load period network impacts were as follows:

(No impacts were found for this analysis)

Light Load Potential Congestion due to Local Energy Deliverability

PJM also studied the delivery of the energy portion of this interconnection request. Any problems identified below are likely to result in operational restrictions to the project under study. The developer can proceed with network upgrades to eliminate the operational restriction at their discretion by submitting a Merchant Transmission Interconnection request.

Note: Only the most severely overloaded conditions are listed below. There is no guarantee of full delivery of energy for this project by fixing only the conditions listed in this section. With a Transmission Interconnection Request, a subsequent analysis will be performed which shall study all overload conditions associated with the overloaded element(s) identified.

(No impacts were found for this analysis)

Short Circuit Analysis

This project does not cause any circuit breakers to exceed their interrupting capability.

Stability Analysis

No mitigation was found to be required due to transient stability.

Reactive Power Analysis

This project meets the power factor requirements.

Steady-State Voltage Analysis

Steady State Voltage analysis is not required for this queue project at this time.

Queue Dependencies

The Queue Projects below are listed in one or more dispatch for the overloads identified in your report. These projects contribute to the loading of the overloaded facilities identified in your report. The percent overload of a facility and cost allocation you may have towards a particular reinforcement could vary depending on the action of these earlier projects. The status of each project at the time of the analysis is presented in the table. This list may change as earlier projects withdraw or modify their requests. This table is valid for load flow analyses only.

Queue Number Project Name Status
AA2-048 Allenwood-Larrabee 34kV Engineering & Procurement
AB1-001 Absecon 12 kV In Service
AB1-138 Navy 34.5kV In Service
AB2-102 Cumberland 230kV Suspended
AE1-061 Minotola 12 kV Engineering & Procurement
AE1-104 BL England 138 kV Engineering & Procurement
AE1-161 Landis 138 kV Active
AE1-179 South Millville-Newport 69 kV Active
AE1-229 Deepwater-Upper Pittsgrove 138 kV Engineering & Procurement
AE1-240 Carlls Corner-Sherman Avenue 69 kV Engineering & Procurement
AE2-020 Cardiff 230 kV I Active
AE2-021 Cardiff 230 kV II Active
AE2-251 * Cardiff 230 kV Active
AE2-272 * Woodstown 12 kV In Service
V1-021 Cape May County 12kV In Service
V2-035 Pittsgrove In Service
V2-041 Clayville 12kV In Service
V2-046 Pilesgrove Township 12kV In Service
V3-036 Ontario 23kV In Service
V4-054 Fairfield Township 12kV In Service
V4-067 Cates Road Egg Harbor Township 12kV In Service
W1-120 Pemberton Township 2 34.5 kV In Service
W1-130 Vine Road 12kV In Service
W2-030 Egg Harbor Township In Service
Y3-012 Huron 69kV In Service

* = Queue Project is after AE2-022 in queue order. Withdrawal of this project is unlikely to affect cost allocation for AE2-022.

Affected Systems
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) Not required
New York Independent System Operator (NYISO) Not required
Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) Not required
Louisville Gas & Electric (LG&E) Not required
Duke Progress Energy (DUKE) Not required
System Reinforcements
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
n6522 Replace substation conductor at Oyster Creek. $585,000 24 Months

AE2-022 is the Driver.

Description: Replace substation conductor at Oyster Creek.

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 650.0 MVA
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 799.0 MVA
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) C 799.0 MVA
Cost Allocation:
Queue Project MW Impact Percent Allocation Allocated Cost ($USD)
AE2-022 100.0 MW 100.0% $585,000
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
(TBD) AEC Rating: 650/799 MVA (SN/SE) $0 0 Months

AE2-022 is the Driver.

Description: AEC Rating: 650/799 MVA (SN/SE)

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 650.0 MVA
28OYSTER C-CEDAR 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 799.0 MVA
Cost Allocation:
Queue Project MW Impact Percent Allocation Allocated Cost ($USD)
AE2-022 100.0 MW 100.0% $0
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
b3737.25 Upgrade Lewis No. 2-Lewis No. 1 138 kV by replacing its bus tie with 2000 A circuit breaker. $500,000 Apr 30 2028

Note: Although Queue Project AE2-022 may not have cost responsibility for this upgrade, Queue Project AE2-022 may need this upgrade in-service to be deliverable to the PJM system. If Queue Project AE2-022 comes into service prior to completion of the upgrade, Queue Project AE2-022 will need an interim study.

Description: To mitigate the Lewis 138 kV bus tie overload, breaker 'U' will be replaced with a 2000 amp breaker.

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
LEWIS #1-LEWIS #2 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
LEWIS #1-LEWIS #2 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 478.0 MVA
LEWIS #1-LEWIS #2 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 478.0 MVA
LEWIS #1-LEWIS #2 138.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) C 478.0 MVA
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
b3737.26 To mitigate the relay limits on this line the relay settings will be changed. $300,000 Apr 30 2028

Note: Although Queue Project AE2-022 may not have cost responsibility for this upgrade, Queue Project AE2-022 may need this upgrade in-service to be deliverable to the PJM system. If Queue Project AE2-022 comes into service prior to completion of the upgrade, Queue Project AE2-022 will need an interim study.

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 650.0 MVA
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 804.0 MVA
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
n6342 Rebuild Cardiff New Freedom 230 kV line. $105,000,000 60 Months

AE2-022 is a Contributor.

Description: To mitigate the (ACE) Cardiff New Freedom 230 kV line (from bus 227900 to bus 219100 ckt 1) overload, it will require increasing the emergency rating of the Cardiff to New Freedom 230 kV line by rebuilding the circuit. The rebuild will include the installation of new poles, foundations, insulators, and conductor. AE2-022 is the driver for this incremental upgrade.

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 796.0 MVA
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 932.0 MVA
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) C 932.0 MVA
Cost Allocation:
Queue Project MW Impact Percent Allocation Allocated Cost ($USD)
AE2-022 127.4 MW 100.0% $105,000,000
RTEP ID Title Total Cost Time Estimate
(TBD) PSEG emergency rating 887 MVA. $0 0 Months

AE2-022 is a Contributor.

Flowgates Addressed by this Reinforcement:
Facility Contingency
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (Any)
New Ratings:
Facility Rating Set Rating Type Rating Value
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) A 0.0 MVA
NEWFRDM-CARDIFF 230.0 kV Ckt 1 line (All) B 887.0 MVA
Cost Allocation:
Queue Project MW Impact Percent Allocation Allocated Cost ($USD)
AE2-022 127.4 MW 100.0% $0
Attachments

AE2-022 Single Line.jpg

Files